If Film is 24 Lies a Second, Is Digital 30 Lies per Second?
Tuesday, December 14, 2010
Now I've Seen Everything Dep't (Update): The Coen Brothers (The Prairie Years)
It's always been the Coen Brothers as a writing-directing team, although Joel is more often the guy calling the camera shots and both Ethan and he write the screenplays, and Ethan produces. The sensibilities that intertwine the two make the creative decisions that make or break these movies, so it's a little hard to be able to discern exactly who does what. The Fact of the matter is, they both do (and Roderick Jaymes, their regular editor is actually a pseudonym for the two).
The Coens have always had an eye to bringing out the best of their material, be it original work or adaptation, with edgy actors who can produce drama and comedy equally well. They successfully tread from the independent film circuit to mainstream cinema in a very short period of time, and their work is of such an obviously high caliber that audiences connected with them not long after critics did, and not even that blind industry ogre, Oscar, could delay giving them top honors. Their acting company contains A-listers and up-and-coming character actors on their way to the A-list. Their biggest-budgeted film was also their biggest failure. And they have such a peculiar sensibility that confounds and even tweaks expectations that their most devoted fans have Coen movies that they can't explain or fathom...and sometimes simply disregard.
But each film is a complicated moebius strip of cruel fate and clueless human failings, reflecting and refracting the rich vein of material from both the cinematic and literary past. It may start as inspiration, but it becomes increasingly Coen to the final frame.
Blood Simple(1984) I read about "the buzz" surrounding this film in Time Magazine, and decided to attend the premiere at the Seattle International Film Festival (complete with Coen Bros. Q & A afterwards). A more violent, solitary and sinister take on James M. Cain's The Postman Always Rings Twice, and Double Indemnity, what stuck were the sick sense of humor, the brazen camera moves by DPBarry Sonnenfeld (I always remember that one sliding the bar that vaults the drunk lying across it--they probably wouldn't pull that one today) and the set-piece structure. what was also clear was that the Coens were studious, not content to show the highlights, but to delve into the psychology of the situation. Case in point: the sequence when stud Ray (John Getz) is getting rid of the body of his lover Abby's husband (Dan Hedaya) — he thinks she killed him and is trying to protect her—by driving it in the middle-of-the-night down a two-lane highway surrounded seemingly infinitely by farm-land. He hears the husband begin to wake up, and in a moment of panic pulls over and flees the car, running into the field.
And stops. And stands there, looking at his car with the lights on, sitting on the freeway with a not-quite-dead body in it. And there's a perfect Coen situation: what do you do? What can you do? You have to go back, or else someone's going to find the car--your car, with the body inside--eventually, but you're scared to death to go back. You have to go back. There's no choice. he has top go back. And the Coen's don't cut a frame of the entire terrifying walk back. Hitchcock meets Truffaut...again. Only Hitchcock would never be so rural.
At the Q&A, the low-key Coen's took the amused audience's questions with matter-of-fact answers, until one blow-hard schlumpfed to his feet. "Why so much blood?" he yelled at the stage. The Coen's blinked, looked at each other. Joel said, "It was dramatically necessary." Ethan, said "People bleed, man." "Bullshit!!" said the questioner. It was a portent to the violent reactions that the Coens would generate no matter what movie they made, what genre they explored. You can't please everybody.
Raising Arizona(1987) Picketed at the time of its release (because a baby was used in the stunt sequences--one wasn't, of course--but you can't tell that to biddies with signs!!), The Coen's mordant sense humor is on fine display on their first out-and-out comedy.
The Coens were angling for respectability with The Hudsucker Proxy. But returning to their roots with their next film garnered the attention they were seeking.
Fargo(1996) "THIS IS A TRUE STORY. The events depicted in this film took place in Minnesota in 1987. At the request of the survivors, the names have been changed. Out of respect for the dead, the rest has been told exactly as it occurred."
Yeah, not so much, I think. Despite an opening crawl that says the story is based on true incidents, the crimes of "Fargo" never happened, but might have been pieced together from several incidents. Car salesman Jerry Lundegaard (William H. Macy), frustrated trying to secure income from his father-in-law (Harve Presnell) conspires with a couple of roughnecks (Peter Stormare, Steve Buscemi) to kidnap his wife and hold her for ransom.
I have a tumultuous relationship with the Coens. I either adore it or hate with all the violence I am capable of. Case in point: I despise Fargo. It bored me senseless, but that said, I love Raising Arizona SO MUCH. So funny and messed up in the best way. Go figure.
Oh, Sugar, I think that's a typical reaction. I have friends who hate Intolerable Cruelty with such a passion they SWEAR (pinky swear) that it is not a Coen Brothers movie. I'm not a big fan of Barton Fink (although it's due for a re-viewing, I think), which is highly regarded. Fargo is case in point: I have friends who just HATE (HATE, HATE) it, while I get warm and fuzzy feelings from it. There are times that the Coens are just too clever for the mass-audience's good. I've come to realize that that is not necessarily a bad thing...or a problem. One should accept that every film of theirs will be different from their last to an alarming degree (although retaining the same dark world-view) and I anticipate and relish the change-up. They open my eyes and ears and mind (also not a problem).
The second part will be next week as my anticipation of their True Grit will be dominating LNTAM next week (and probably too much).
2 comments:
I have a tumultuous relationship with the Coens. I either adore it or hate with all the violence I am capable of. Case in point: I despise Fargo. It bored me senseless, but that said, I love Raising Arizona SO MUCH. So funny and messed up in the best way. Go figure.
Oh, Sugar, I think that's a typical reaction. I have friends who hate Intolerable Cruelty with such a passion they SWEAR (pinky swear) that it is not a Coen Brothers movie. I'm not a big fan of Barton Fink (although it's due for a re-viewing, I think), which is highly regarded. Fargo is case in point: I have friends who just HATE (HATE, HATE) it, while I get warm and fuzzy feelings from it. There are times that the Coens are just too clever for the mass-audience's good. I've come to realize that that is not necessarily a bad thing...or a problem. One should accept that every film of theirs will be different from their last to an alarming degree (although retaining the same dark world-view) and I anticipate and relish the change-up. They open my eyes and ears and mind (also not a problem).
The second part will be next week as my anticipation of their True Grit will be dominating LNTAM next week (and probably too much).
Post a Comment